After discussing Lazarus' appraisal theory of emotion in class, we learned that emotion may be the result of simply how we think about the events occuring around us. Anything that happens can be perceived as positive or negative based on a variety of factors - this cognitive appraisal of the situation then determines the emotion we experience. The video viewed in class about the ancient philosopher Seneca identified his belief about the source of emotions such as anger: we don't think enough about the things that could go wrong and therefore, we are surprised when they occur. As a result of surprise we feel angry over our disappontment or feelings of helplessness - it is then that emotions are the strongest.
You are to analyze the philosophy of Seneca against the theory of Lazarus and explain how the two relate to each other. What do they have in common? Do they conflict in any way? What are your opinions on these ideas?Please include a picture with your posting (of about 2-3 paragraphs) which helps illustrate what you learned.
No comments:
Post a Comment